Short Note : The plaintiff's case is this; Hafeez Karamatullah, a resident of Bhopal, owned a house near Bans Baheda mosque. The mother of the deceased Karamatullah and plaintiff's father Sk. Abdullah were real brother and sister. Thus plaintiff was the maternal sister of Hafeez Karamatullah. 2. The defendants, while admitting that Hafeez Karamatullah was the owner of the disputed house, further admitted that he died as a bachelor on 23-5-1983. They admitted that the mother of Hafeez Karamatullah was real sister of Sk. Abdullah, father of the plaintiff. The defendants, however, contended that the plaintiff has no right, title or interest in the property left by Hafeez Karamatullah and pleaded that they were his cousins and hence heirs to his property. Held : It may, however, be mentioned that the plaintiff has to succeed on the proof of pleadings and weakness of the defence does not improve the plaintiff's position. There is thus the concurrent finding that the plaintiff is not the heir of deceased Hafeez Karamatullah. 3. The plaintiff claims to be the daughter of the sister of her father Sk. Abdullah. Her evidence in para 7 shows that she was not on visiting terms with Hafeez Karamatullah and that she did not attend or serve Hafeez Karamatullah during his illness. This is a circumstance to show that she was not a relation of the deceased, otherwise, she would be on visiting terms with Hafeez Karamatullah and would at least have served him during his illness. She was questioned whether the deceased had executed a will during his lifetime donating the disputed house to a school near the mosque Bans Baheda. She could not deny the alleged will. She admitted that no will was executed in her favour by the deceased. Appeal dismissed.