Short Note : 1. The plaintiff-respondent No. 1 had filed a suit for evicting the appellant on the ground that the defendants were in arrears of rent. The respondent No. 1 claimed that being the Karta of the joint Hindu family was entitled to bring the suit and terminate the tenancy. 2. Under the Hindu Law the Karta of a joint family represents all the members of the joint family, including the minors in a litigation with regard to the family property and he is also entitled to manage the joint family property, After the death of Puranchand, Sitaram who was the only male member of the family became the Karta and could thus bring the present suit after terminating the tenancy. He could also take action to terminate the tenancy on behalf of the other members of the joint family. Hari Shankar vs. Komalchand, 1971 JLJ 154, relied on. Appeal dismissed.