Short Note : 1. The revision was directed against an order disallowing an application for amendment of plaint moved by the plaintiff applicant. The suit was for eviction of a tenant and arrears of rent. The tenant in his written statement pleaded that he was initially inducted as a tenant but later his possession from a certain date had become adverse to the plaintiff. The plaintiff, therefore, sought to amend the plaint and prayed for relief of possession in the alternative, on the basis of title. The application was rejected. Held: The non-applicant's learned counsel conceded that if a suit for possession on the basis of title could be filed, such a relief could as well be added in the present suit. But the grievance is that the amendment normally relates back to the date of the suit. If question of limitation was left open to the non-applicants and if they could plead that the suit for possession was barred on the date the application was moved, they would not mind the amendment to be incorporated. This Court permits the amendment to be made subject to plea of limitation which the defendants-non-applicants might raise. Revision allowed.