Short Note : 1. The defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3 have filed this revision petition against an order dated 14th July, 1976, passed by the Sixth Additional District Judge, Indore, in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 23/76, whereby the plaintiff's prayer for temporary injunction has been allowed. Held: The learned lower appellate Court, by its detailed and well considered order, has found that the plaintiff has satisfied all the ingredients required for granting the relief of temporary injunction and it has accordingly exercised its judicial discretion which cannot be said to be arbitrary or illegal. As the rival contentions raised by the respective parties have yet to be finally decided by the trial Court, I refrain from expressing any opinion regarding those controversies and, in my opinion, this is not a fit case to interfere in revision with the impugned order passed by the learned lower appellate Court which cannot be said to have resulted in substantial failure of justice. 2. It has been held by the Supreme Court in a decision reported in Brij Gopal v. Kishan Gopal ( AIR 1973 SC 1096 ) relying upon its earlier decision reported in S.S. Khanna v. F.J. Dillon ( AIR 1964 SC 497 ) that the exercise of the jurisdiction under section 115, Civil Procedure Code, by the High Court is discretionary and that Court is not bound to interfere merely because the conditions in Clauses (a), (b) or (c) of that section are satisfied. AIR 1973 SC 1096 and AIR 1964 SC 497 relied on. Revision dismissed.