Short Note : 1. The plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit for ejectment and so far as the requirement for non-residential part of the accommodation it was alleged that she needed the accommodation because her husband would run a business. By this amendment the plaintiff-petitioner wanted to amend this part of the plaint alleging that she has a major son and he will run the business instead of her husband as unfortunately during the pendency of tile suit her husband died. The trial court rejected this application by holding that this amounts to a new cause - of action and, therefore, the amendment could not be allowed. Held : It could not be disputed that even on the date when the suit was filed, the son of the petitioner was in existence and the plaintiff petitioner could have filed the suit also on the ground that she needed the accommodation for running of the business by her son. It appears that as at that time the husband of the plaintiff was alive only his name was mentioned but during the pendency of this suit it appears that the husband died and therefore the plaintiff-petitioner now wants to continue the - suit by alleging that the business shall he run by her son who is also a major. It could not be doubted that there is an alteration of cause of action not a new case is being set up. The case set up is for the requirement of the family Even if as contended by learned counsel, the plea for the requirement of the husband could not be accepted under section 12 (1) (f) of the M. P Accommodation Control Act, the plaintiff-landlady could always plead that she needed it for her son as that it would be covered under the provisions contained in section 12 (1) (f) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act. It also can not be disputed that although the husband might have died during the pendency of the suit; but the plaintiff's son was living can on the date of the suit and therefore, the view taken by the learned Court below does not appear to be justified that by this amendment the nature of the suit is being changed or a new cause of action is being introduced. Revision allowed.