Short Note : 1. The non-applicant-plaintiff filed a suit for Rs. 200 alleging that the husband of petitioner No. 1 and father of the rest of the petitioners had taken a loan of Rs. 200. At trial the plaintiff was examined and one Shanker and Ex. P-1 an account book was also produced which was exhibited. The only evidence examined on behalf of the petitioner was a Mukhtar whose statement is that he does not know if Amolaksingh had taken any loan of Rs. 200. On consideration of this evidence, the learned trial Court believed the evidence of the plaintiff-non-applicant and decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff placing reliance on Ex P-1 also. Held : Learned counsel appearing for the defendants petitioners contended that Ex. P-1 could not have been admitted in evidence. However, he concedes that this objection was not taken when this document was admitted in evidence; but for the first time it has been taken in this revision petition. Apparently if the objection was not taken at the time when this document was admitted in evidence, this question cannot now be raised in the revision. Apart from it, the Court below accepted the evidence of the plaintiff and it therefore is a pure question of appreciation of evidence and no question of law is involved. Revision dismissed.