Short Note : From bare perusal of the impugned order it is clear that the learned trial Judge has not cared to state the alleged good cause assigned by the defendant for non-appearance on the relevant date and whether the cause so alleged constitutes a good cause within the meaning of rule 7 of Order 9. Existence of goods cause is a condition precedent for giving defendant right to join from the same stage at which he failed to appear. Order 9, rule 7, makes it clear that unless good cause is shown the defendant cannot be relegated to the position that he would have occupied if he had appeared. The impugned order appears to have been mechanically passed. It cannot be termed as a judicial order in the true sense. A judicial order is an order which is outcome of the application of the mind. Revision allowed.