Short Note : 1. It is true that the lower appellate Court has not closely analysed the evidence on record, but this fact alone would not render its judgment erroneous in law, It is settled that it is not the duty of the appellate Court, when it agrees with the view of the trial Court on the evidence, either to restate the effect of the evidence or to reiterate the reasons given by the trial Court. It is further settled that expression of general agreement with the reasons given by the trial Court, the decision of which is under appeal, would ordinarily suffice. Girjanandini v. Bijendra Narain, AIR 1967 SC 1124 relied on. Appeal dismissed.