Short Note : 1. The short facts as have emerged from the prosecution case are that on 17-5-1969, a gang of Municipal officials serving under the Municipal Corporation Indore, who admittedly are public servants, tried to seize one she-calf belonging to the applicant. As they were carrying a campaign to round up stray cattle for admitting them in the cattle-pound. in that process, applicant assaulted Pandu PW. 2, Aziz PW. 3, Shivji PW. 5 and used criminal force against Daroga Rehmatali PW. 1. Two of the prosecution witnesses PW. 2 Panduran, and PW. 3, Abdul Aziz as well as other witnesses PW. 5. Shivjiram PW. 4 Ramasra and P.W.6 Babulal did Dot fully support the prosecution case. However, relying upon the evidence of Dr. Dube PW. 8 and Dr. Chaudhari PW. 13, it has been found that Pandurang PW. 2, Abdul Aziz PW.3 and Shivjiram PW. 5, received simple injuries. It has also been found that the applicant tried to assault these public servants with a stick and the finding of both the lower Courts, which is based on consideration and appreciation of evidence does not require any interference. 2. It was further argued that the applicant has so far already undergone a total sentence of one and a half month and considering his young age at the time of the incident and even now he deserves a leniency in the matter of sentence and that it would not serve any useful purpose if, after such a long lapse of time, he is again compelled to undergo the remaining jail sentence. Held: Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this submission deserves consideration. But, looking to the nature of offence viz, assaulting public servants while they were discharging duty, I am of opinion that the applicant should at least be awarded a sentence of fine instead of directing him to undergo the remaining jail sentence. 3. In the result, this revision succeeds partly. The conviction of the applicant is maintained but the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for four months is modified to the sentence of rigorous imprisonment already under gone and a fine of Rs. 100 which shall be deposited by the applicant in the trial Court within a fortnight from today failing which he shall suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month. Revision partly allowed.