Short Note : 1. The applicants, claimed declaration of the rights with respect to the suit lands and prayed for permanent injunction to restrain the non-applicants from interfering with the possession of the applicants. The applicants also made an application for temporary injunction. The trial Court granted ad-interim injunction and after hearing both the parties confirmed the same. The non-applicants filed Misc. Appeal No. 32 of 1977 in the Court of the First Additional District Judge, Ujjain against the order of the trial Court. The learned Judge of the lower Court allowed the appeal and vacated the temporary injunction. The applicants have, therefore, come to this Court in revision. 2. The question as to whether any private partition took place between the parties or not and whether in pursuance of that partition the applicants got exclusive possession, are highly controversial matters in this case. In case no partition took place between the parties and if the suit property, is part of the Joint Hindu family property all the members of the joint family would be presumed to be in possession of the joint family property and hence in such a case it would not be desirable to grant injunction to restrain a joint owner from interfering with the possession of the other owners. The grant of injunction is entirely a matter of discretion. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case it cannot be said that the lower appellate Court has committed any jurisdictional error in vacating the temporary injunction granted by the trial Court. I am, therefore of the view that there is no ground to make interference by this Court in revision in the impugned order passed by the Court below. Revision dismissed.