Short Note : 1. On behalf of the defendants an application was moved to re-call the witnesses of the plaintiffs who were examined in the absence of the defendants. The trial Court allowed this application. In revision, the argument on behalf of the plaintiff was that such a power could not be exercised at the instance of a party in view of Order 18, rule 17, CPC. Held: Reliance on Order 18, rule 17, CPC., is not proper as the Court has not invoked that power which is vested in it by virtue of the aforesaid provision. It is at the instance of the party, namely, the defendants in the instant case that the trial Court has ordered re-call. This power flows from "power to call witnesses" contained in Order 16, rule 1, CPC. Power to call includes 'power to re-call'. At any rate even if there is no express provision governing the situation, the order will be deemed to have been passed under inherent powers. Revision dismissed.