Short Note : 1. The defendant No. 1 registered a sale deed in favour of defendant Nos. 5 and 6 on 7th October 1976. Thereafter defendant Nos. 5 and 6 executed another sale-deed in favour of defendant No. 2 on 10-8-1976. Thus the ultimate sale deed is in favour of defendant-applicant. The relief which the plaintiff has claimed in the suit is declaration to the effect that the sale deed is null and void have been issued as against the plaintiff. The defendant applicant in this suit by application dated 7-2-1978 prayed for better particulars in respect of the description of the property sold by the aforesaid sale deeds. This application was opposed by the plaintiff-non-applicant but was rejected by the impugned order. Hence this revision. Held : The sale deed in respect of which better particulars are being sought is in possession of the defendant. As such he is not at all justified in moving an application under Order 6, rule 5 CPC. I am fortified in this view by the ratio of the case reported in 1967 MPLJ Short Note 67 (Chhedilal v. State of M.P.). 2. Reliance on the principles laid down in 1967 JLJ Short Note 94 and 1972 JLJ Short Note 67 is not available to the learned counsel for the applicant in view of the facts of the present case. Accordingly, the present Case does not disclose any ground for exercise of revisional jurisdiction of this Court under section 115 (1) CPC. 1967 JLJ-SN 94 and 1972 JLJ SN 67 distinguished, 1967 MPLJ SN 67 relied on. Revision dismissed.