JUDGMENT 1. :- Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and I have also gone through the record. Even if the statement of the defendant is considered and accepted, the defendant is not carrying on business for which the shop was taken on rent. The first appellate court is right in holding that the premises has not been used by the defendant tenant for the purpose for which the shop was taken on rent for a period of more than six months. There is no substantial question of Law involved in this appeal. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.Appeal dismissed. *******