Short Note : This is defendant's second appeal. Defendant is the tenant of the plaintiff In August 1964 he agreed to vacate the shop which was needed by the plaintiff for reconstruction on the condition that he would be inducted as a tenant again. 2. According to the plaintiff while the shop was in process of reconstruction the defendant requested him to put a cement concrete slab and make a cellar for storing goods. The plaintiff agreed to that provided the defendant paid rent for it in sedition to what was agreed for the shop. The rent for the cellar was fixed at Rs. 31.87 np. including taxes. The rent for the newly built shop was fixed at Rs. 53.12 np. In the present suit for arrears of rent, the plaintiff claimed rent Rs. 84.99 np. for both the shop and the cellar. 3. The defendant disputed the rent for cellar. He told that the contractual rent Rs. 53.12 np. for both the shop and the cellar. Cellar being part of the same shop forming one unit. He denied the oral agreement and further pleaded that the plaintiff could not claim anything more than the standard rent which comes to Rs. 22/- only per month. Held : The learned Additional District Judge, on appreciation of evidence came to the conclusion that the defendant had agreed to pay Re. 31.87 np. per month for the cellar and Rs. 52.12 np. for the shop, in all Rs. 84.99 np. There is no perversity in the findings. In second appeal the findings cannot be assailed. The Civil Court has no jurisdiction to fix the standard rent. 4. The appeal dismissed with costs.