Short Note : 1. The petitioner was employed as a driver temporarily until further orders by order dated 28th July 1961. In April 1971, there was a police report against him. By order, dated 22nd April 1971 the petitioner was suspended. Thereafter, by order dated 8th February 1972, the petitioner's services were terminated as no longer required. Held: The services of a temporary Government servant can be dispensed with after notice under rule 12 of the Madhya Pradesh Government Servants (Temporary and Quasi Permanent) Rules, 1960. The contention of the petitioner is that neither any notice was given to the petitioner nor salary for the period of the notices was paid as required by rule 12. Admittedly no notice was given nor salary for notice period was paid. Thus the termination of services was not in accordance with rule 12. Order terminating services quashed. Parshuram v. Honorable C. J., M. P., 1974 JLJ 157 , relied on. Petition allowed.