Short Note : 1. The applicant filed the suit against the non-applicant for the recovery of Rs. 150 being the balance amount due against the non-applicant in milk supply business and Rs. 81 by way of interest as per market custom and damages at the rate of Rs. 1.50 per cent per month. The trial Court decreed the suit for the principal amount of Rs. 150 together with notice charges amounting to Rs. 10 but did not allow interest as there was no agreement to pay the same. The applicant has, therefore, come to this Court in revision. 2. It is settled law that in the absence of any agreement or a statutory provision interest by way of damages cannot be allowed. It is true that the Court may allow interest under usage of trade, but such a relief is always discretionary. The evidence of the applicant Lalchand (PW-1) and that of Madanlal (PW-2) on the point of usage is not satisfactory. The witness Madanlal in the cross-examination has stated that in the business of milk he had no occasion to see any transaction in which interest was paid. To my mind looking to the suit transaction the discretion of the trial Court in disallowing interest on the basis of usage cannot be called to be arbitrary and hence it is not a fit case wherein this Court should make any interference in revision. Revision dismissed.