Short Note : 1. This petition is directed against an order of the Board of Revenue by which it was held that the proceedings before the Commissioner had abated as the appellant Kalicharan has died. Held : A preliminary objection had been raised by Shri Dixit, learned counsel for the respondents as to the tenability of the petition. It is contended that the petition, as framed, would not be competent as it has not joined the Tribunals whose orders are sought to be challenged in this Misc. Petition as parties. In Laxmi Kumari v. Radhekishan (1961 JLJ 1344), it is held that if the Tribunals whose orders are sought to be challenged are not impleaded as parties, the petition was liable to be dismissed. In this case, neither the Collector not the Commissioner nor even the Board of Revenue who have passed orders which are subject matter of challenge in the petition, has not been impleaded as party. The petition is liable to be dismissed on this short ground. 2. It has, however, also been pointed out that the petitioners have an alternative remedy inasmuch as in respect of a dispute as to the title to the land, the Act itself envisages that the matter ought to be decided by a civil suit. The statutory remedy indicated has not been availed of and, therefore, the petition would abate by virtue of section 58 of the 42nd Amendment Act. 3. An application has been made at this stage or impleading Board of Revenue as a party. The petition is of 1974 and an amendment at this stage cannot be permitted. The application for amendment is, therefore, dismissed. 1961 JLJ 1344 relied on. Petition dismissed.