Short Note : 1. Respondent No. 6 which is Co-operative Society registered under the M.P. Co-operative Societies Act 1960, had to elect a delegate to represent it in the Ratlam Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Respondent No. 1 was appointed by respondent No. 2 as a returning officer to conduct that election. The petitioner was one of the candidates who had filed nomination form, but it was rejected by respondent No. 1 on a scrutiny of the nomination papers. Held : Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court has come to the conclusion that this petition deserves to be dismissed. Section 64 of the Act provides a remedy to the petitioner to raise a dispute before the Registrar relating to the alleged illegal rejection of his nomination paper after the process of election is completed. It is now well settled that after the election is over if a remedy is available to the petitioner for the redress of all his grievances, whether founded on the ultimate result of the election or upon any interlocutory order passed in the process of election, it would not be proper for the High Court to exercise its power under Article 226 of the Constitution. Malamsingh v. Collector Sehore, 1971 JLJ 379 , relied on. Shivdayal v. M.K.P. Ravat, 1975 JLJ 326 , Brij Bihari v. I.L. Khare, 1976 JLJ 401 distinguished. Petition dismissed.