JUDGMENT : S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J. - In this appeal we have heard learned Counsel for the parties and have also gone through the judgment of the courts below. We are unable to find any error of law in the judgment of the High Court. In fact the Counsel for the appellant has pressed this appeal substantially on the question of sentence. So far as accused Kailash is concerned, he appears to be a young man of less than 20 years at the time of the incident. This therefore is a fit case where he should be dealt with under the Probation of Offenders Act. We therefore suspend the sentence of imprisonment and instead release Kailash on probation of good conduct and direct that he should execute a bond for Rs. 2000/- for maintaining good behaviour for a period of two years before Chief Judicial Magistrate Shakti. In case of breach of the conditions of the bond, he shall be called upon to serve out the sentence imposed. Two months time is allowed to furnish the bond. 2. As regards Lala Jai Singh and Phudoo in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the fact that they have been on bail it will not be conducive in the interest of justice to send them back to jail but the complainant must be adequately compensated. We, therefore, set aside the sentence of imprisonment of these appellants and for the balance of sentence remitted, we impose a fine of Rs. 2000/- on each of them in default two years R.I. Six months time is allowed to pay the fine. The appellants will be discharged from their bail bonds only after they have paid the fine. The entire fine if realised, be paid to Chajju Ram, the complainant. With this modification the appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed.