Short Note : 1. The only point arose in this revision was that the inquiry under section 116 Cr.P.C. was not completed within six months and as such the impugned order was not warranted by law. Held : It was stated by the learned counsel himself that the inquiry in the case was started on 7-12-1978. The learned Sessions Judge has mentioned in his order that this inquiry was completed on 3-5-79 which was within six months as required under sub-section (6) of section 116 Cr.P.C. The learned Sessions Judge has thereafter given details as to how the final order came to be passed on 19-6-79. The learned counsel for the applicant has not challenged these details. His contention is that the inquiry should be deemed to have been completed on 19-6-79. Sub-section (6) of section 116 Cr.P.C. says that "inquiry under this section shall be completed within a period of six months from the date of commencement". In the instant case the inquiry was completed on 3-5-79 which was within six months of the commencement dated 7-12-78. An order under section 177 Cr.P.C. is to be passed upon such inquiry. The date of order under section 117 would not be crucial for computation of six month's period as provided under subsection 116 Cr.P.C. Precisely this is the view taken by the learned Sessions Judge. Revision dismissed.