Short Note : 1. The plaintiff claimed a decree for Rs. 16,000 and alleged in the plaint that on account of the payment of Rs. 100 made by the defendant on 14-11-1970 the suit was within time after the plaintiff closed his evidence on 9-8-1975, the defendant's evidence was also closed on 26-8-1976. Thereafter prayer was made by the plaintiff during the course of the argument to recall the plaintiff for proving the alleged payment of Rs. 100. This prayer was allowed by the impugned order. Held : The trial Court had the jurisdiction to permit additional evidence being given by the plaintiff under section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code. By the impugned order not only the plaintiff but the defendant also has been allowed to lead such evidence as he may deem proper in reply to the evidence that the plaintiff may lead. In these circumstances, it cannot be said that any jurisdictional error has been committed by the trial Court. The trial Court shall, in these circumstances permit the plaintiff to lead additional evidence and after he closes his case, the defendant shall also be permitted to lead such further evidence as he may deem proper. Revision dismissed.