Short Note : 1. Respondent No. 1 Bhogiram, at the relevant time, was employed as a Conductor in the services of M.P. State Road Transport Corporation. The bus in which he was on duty as the Conductor was checked on 26.4.1971. It was found that eight passengers had not been issued tickets. Similarly, no tickets were issued for three mounds of luggage. In both the cases, the fare was realized, but the same had not been entered in the collection sheet. Bhogiram was charge-sheeted for misconduct, punishable under Standing Order No. 12(1) (b) and (d). The domestic enquiry officer found that the respondent was guilty of the charges. Therefore, the services of the respondent were terminated by an order dated 8.10.1971. Respondent Bhogiram challenged the legality of the order before the Labour Court. The Labour Court permitted the evidence to be adduced by both the parties and thereafter decided the case, holding inter-alia, that the domestic enquiry was illegal inasmuch as no opportunity for examination of Vijai Bahadur was given to the respondent Bhogiram and also that the findings arrived at by the domestic enquiry were perverse. The Labour Court also found that the defence of the respondent was genuine. The ticket books had been exhausted and, therefore, tickets could not be issued. The Labour Court, therefore, allowed the application, directing that the respondent Bhogiram be reinstated with half back wages. Against this decision, the petitioners filed a revision before the Industrial Court, Madhya Pradesh, Indore. 2. The Learned Member Judge, passed a cryptic order stating that the charges were not proved and, therefore, he would not interfere in the revision. We think that the order does not cover the entire controversy in the matter. There has been no decision on the question whether the domestic enquiry was legal or not and secondly, the question of back wages has not been decided by the revisional Court. We think that the Industrial Court should pass a proper speaking order. Petition allowed.