Short Note : 1. Respondent No. 1 Bhogiram at the relevant time, was employed as a conductor in the services of M.P. State Road Transport Corporation. The bus in which he was on duty as the conductor was checked on 26.4.1971. It was found that eight passengers had not been issued tickets. The domestic enquiry officer found that the respondent was guilty of the charges. Therefore the services of the respondent were terminated by an order dated 8.10.1971. Respondent Bhogiram challenged the legality of the order before the Labour Court. The Labour Court allowed the application, directing that the respondent Bhogiram be reinstated with half back wages. After this decision, the petitioner filed a revision before the Industrial Court, M.P. The learned Member Judge, passed a cryptic order stating that the charges were not proved and therefore he would not interfere in revision. 2. This Court thinks that the order does not cover the entire controversy in the matters. There has been no decision on the question whether the domestic enquiry was legal or not and secondly the question of back wages has not been decided by the revisional Court. The Industrial Court should pas, a proper speaking order. This Court therefore, remands the case to the Industrial Court for deciding the case afresh. Case remanded.