JUDGMENT K.N. Singh and S.J. Hyder, JJ. - By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner has challenged validity of the order of the Manager of Mahatma Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya Intermediate College, Firozabad, Agra, dated April 20, 1974, terminating his services as teacher in the College. 2. Mahatma Gandhi Balika Vidhyalaya Intermediate College, Firozabad, is an aided and recognised institution. The College imparts education to girl students only. In September, 1969, the petitioner was appointed as a teacher to teach Mathematics for a session only. He continued to be employed in subsequent sessions also. In July, 1972, the petitioner was appointed as Science Demonstator, for Intermediate classes. He continued to work on that post till his services were terminated by the impugned order dated April 20, 1974, which informed the petitioner that his services would stand terminated on May 20, 1974, Aggrieved, the petitioner has challenged the validity of the order of termination. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the petitioner's services have been terminated in pursuance of the Government order dated September 6, 1972. Which lays down a policy decision that no male teacher should be confirmed in service in girls institutions. In the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, it is asserted that the petitioner's services have not been terminated in pursuance of the directions contained in the Government order dated September 6, 1971, instead his services have been terminated in terms of his conditions of service. The petitioner has failed to place any material before us to show that his services were terminated in pursuance of the directions contained in the State Governments order dated September 6, 1971. 4. In paragraph 3 of the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the Regional Inspectress of Girls Schools, it has been asserted that the petitioner was appointed as a Mathematics teacher in the institution in 1969 for that year and his services came to an end at the close of that academic year. He was again re-employed in the next session and his services were again terminated at the end of that session. The petitioner was appointed for each academic year from July to May and the appointment was approved by the Regional Inspectress of Girls Schools. The last appointment made in favour of the petitioner was on July 16, 1973 for the session 1973-74 only on ad hoc and temporary basis. The petitioner was appointed for each academic year from July to May and the appointment was approved by the Regional Inspectress of Girls Schools. The last appointment made in favour of the petitioner was on July 16, 1973 for the session 1973-74 only on ad hoc and temporary basis. The Regional Inspectress of Girls Schools approved the petitioners appointment. A copy of the appointment order is also filed as annexure CA-5 to the counter affidavit. On a perusal of the same it is quite apparent that the petitioner had been appointed for the session 1973-74 only and as such his services stood terminated on the expiry of the session. The order of termination therefore does not suffer from any legal infirmity warranting interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. 5. In the result the petition fails and is accordingly dismissed, but there will be no order as to costs.