Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

1980 DIGILAW 241 (SC)

Ramakrishna Hegde v. Election Commission Of India

1980-04-29

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, R.S.PATHAK, V.R.KRISHNA IYER

body1980
V. R. KRISHNA IYER, J. (1) BREVITY is a nececity, especially when dealing with a matter essentially interlocutory and unwitting observations may bit a mark the archer never meant. So we pass this laconic order disposing of the special leave petition. (2) LEAVE is sought to challenge an order of the Chief Election Commissioner of India which in its concluding portions runs thus: 18. Having regard to the above considerations and pending final decision in the matter arising out of the petition of Dr. Murli Manohar Joshi, dated 14/04/1980, claiming to be the real Janata Party, the Commission in exercise of its powers conferred on it by Article 324 of the Constitution read with Rules 5 and 10 of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, paragraphs 3, 6, 7, 8 and 18 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, and all other powers enabling it in that behalf hereby orders that :- (I) The symbol Haldhar within Wheel (Chakra-haldhar) reserved hitherto for the Janata Party be frozen until further orders; (II) The group of the Janata Party led by Shri Atal Bihari Vaj payee be recognised as National Party under the name Bharatiya Janata Party; (III) The symbol Lotus be reserved for the said Bharatiya Janata Party; and (IV) The symbol Lotus be omitted from the list of free symbols for all those States where it is so included in that list. (3) THE subject-matter relates to a squabble over a symbol which has attained white heat because of the elections to the State Assemblies coming shortly. (4) THE pathology of political parties suffering self-division sometimes projects itself on the forensic screen and the present leave petition is but an illustration. The Janata Party underwent a fission and what was once a National Party, became on account of this metamorphosis two groups, each claiming to be the real Janata Party. The split-personality syndrome resulted in the claim for the Janata Party symbol by both the groups. Rule 15 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 vests power in the Commission to allot symbols when rivals claim the same. The Chief Election Commissioner pending final determination, passed the order allotting the symbol Lotus to the Bharatiya Janata Party. He also recognised as a National Party the said Bharatiya Janata Party. The original symbol of Janata Party Chakra-haldhar was, however, frozen until further orders. The Chief Election Commissioner pending final determination, passed the order allotting the symbol Lotus to the Bharatiya Janata Party. He also recognised as a National Party the said Bharatiya Janata Party. The original symbol of Janata Party Chakra-haldhar was, however, frozen until further orders. This resulted in the petitioners group of the Janata Party without recognition as a National Party and without a symbol to fight the election with. Aggrieved by this order the petitioners group, which claims to be the pristine Janata Parly, has challenged the validity of the order. (5) WE have heard Shri Tarkunde for the petitioner-group, hri Shanti Bhushan for the Bharadya Janata Party and Shri Abdul Khader for the Election Commission. We do not articulate our reasons, as expressions of opinion in the process of ratiocination in a special leave petition arising out of an interlocutory proceeding may affect adversely one party or the other. We make the following direction, which commands broad consensus and counsel for the Election Commission also agrees that the Chief Election Commissioner will implement it. (6) WE direct the Chief Election Commissioner, in the light of the materials placed before us, to recognise the petitioners party as a National Party, for the purpose of the forthcoming elections, within the meaning of Rule 7. We further direct the Election Commission to allot a symbol to the petitioners party-on application forthwith. (7) THE final decision may take time although it may have to be done is expeditiously as circumstances permit. But we make it clear that nothing mentioned in our order will influence the Commission in its decision. (8) THE battle for the ballot is won, if we may venture an obiter, not by symbolic struggle for symbols but by the plurality of little Indians making their little marks in the little booths for those who serve and deserve.