B. N. KATJU, J. ( 1 ) THE applicant was convicted under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act and sentenced to imprisonment till the rising of the Court and a fine of Rs. 500 and in default to undergo two months rigorous imprisonment by the Magistrate First Class, Meerut by his judgment dated 24-1-1975 passed in case No. 132. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 1975 which was dismissed by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut by his judgment dated 11-11-1978 which runs as follows: this appeal has been filed against the order dated 24-1-1975 passed by S. N. Gupta, Magistrate 1st Class convicting the appellant under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act to imprisonment till the rising of the Court and to pay a fine of Rs. 500 or to undergo R. I. for two months. The prosecution story was that on 16-6-78 at about 7-30 p. m. the accused was found carrying 10 quintals of wheat in two buggies from Tahsil Baghpat towards Meerut without any licence or permit, thereby contravening the provisions of Clause 8 of U. P. Wheat and Wheat Products (Regulation of Trade and Control of Movement) Order, 1973. The accused was sent up to trial. The learned Magistrate found him guilty and sentenced him. Aggrieved by that order, the present appeal has been filed. The appellant did not turn up on the date of hearing. The appeal was heard i. e. I have heard the learned Counsel for the State and have also gone through the record. The finding appears to be justified on the basis of record. There is nothing which may warrant any interference by this court. So the findings of fact are confirmed. The appeal has no substance and merits dismissal. ORDER 1. The appeal is dismissed. The conviction of the accused is maintained. Warrant for realisation of fine shall be issued under Section 421, Cr. P. C. ( 2 ) THE applicant has now come up in revision to this Court. ( 3 ) UNDER Section 387, Cr. P. C. the rules contained in Chapter XXVII relating to judgments of a criminal Court of original jurisdiction have been made applicable to the judgments in appeal of a Court of Session. Under Section 354 (1) (b), Cr. ( 3 ) UNDER Section 387, Cr. P. C. the rules contained in Chapter XXVII relating to judgments of a criminal Court of original jurisdiction have been made applicable to the judgments in appeal of a Court of Session. Under Section 354 (1) (b), Cr. P. C. which contained in Chapter XXVII a judgment of criminal Court of original jurisdiction is required to contain the point or points for determination, the decision thereon and the reasons for the decision. Section 354 (1) (b), Cr. P. C. is thus applicable to the judgments in appeal of a Court of Session by virtue of Section 387, Cr. P. C. ( 4 ) EVEN if the appellant and his counsel were absent on the date of hearing of the appeal it was necessary for the learned Judge to discuss the evidence led in support of the prosecution case and to give reasons for accepting or rejecting it in view of Section 354 (1) (b), Cr. P. C. which was not done. The judgment of the learned Judge is thus clearly illegal and deserves to be set aside. ( 5 ) THIS application is accordingly allowed and the judgment of the III Additional Sessions Judge, meerut dated 11-11-1978 is set aside and the case is remanded to the Court of the learned Judge for rehearing Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 1975 and deciding it in accordance with law. ( 6 ) IT may be mentioned that the additional evidence which was recorded by the Chief Judicial magistrate, Meerut in compliance with the order of the Court dated 25-7-1979 shall be taken into consideration by the learned Judge in deciding the appeal. .