Pathak, C.J. (Actg.):- This revision petition under Rule 34 of the Rules for Administration of Justice A Police in Nagaland is directed against the orders dated 22.1.81, 23.1.81 and 23.4.81 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kohima in Money Suit No. 4 of 1980. 2. The Opposite Party 3rd. (NH) BN, Assam Rifles, Kohima, Nagaland filed a money suit on which summons was issued on the defendant, the present petitioner. On the first date of appearance the defendant could not be present himself. But on the subsequent date he entered appearance and sho­wed cause for his failure to be present on the earlier date, However, the learned trial Court rejected the cause shown by the petitioner. Although an order for exparte hearing was passed, it was not taken up for exparte hearing. But sub­sequently by the final order impugned before me the exparte hearing was taken and it was decreed against the defendant. 3. This case has come up from the State of Nagaland. It is found that on the next date the petitioner duly showed cause for his failure to appear on the first date which was only a date for appearance. When on the next date he appeared and showed cause, the Court should have conside­red his application and should have disposed of the applica­tion in its proper perspective. On the other hand the learned trial Court failed to consider his prayer to allow him to file the written statement. I have gone through the order dated 23.4 81 and I find that no reason has been given to reject the petition filed by the present petitioner on 2.2.81. consideration of the entire matter, I find that in the interest of justice the written statement which has already been filed, shall be taken into consideration and the suit should proceed on the basis of the plaint as well a the written statement filed by the petitioner. 4. In the result the impugned order passed by the lear­ned Chief Judicial Magistrate is set aside and the Rule is made absolute. The petition is allowed. However, I pass no order as to costs. The parties should appear before the learned trial Court on 18th of January, 1982 to take necessary orders from the trial Court. Send down the records of the case immediately to the trial Court.