JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The case of the prosecution is that a search was made on 7th June, 1973 in the house of the accused petitioner by the Excise Inspector, Khairthal Shri Navratanmal Kankriya and that as as result of the said search illicit liquor was recovered and that the said liquor on examination by the Central Public Analyst was found to contain alcohol. 3. Shri Rastogi, learned counsel for the petitioner has not challenged the conviction under section 16/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1954, and he confined his submissions on the question of sentence. Shri Rastogi has submitted that the accused petitioner has not been previously convicted in respect of the said offence and that he is a young man of 32 pears and that it is a fit case in which the benefit of provisions of Section 360 Cr.P.C. should have been given to the accused petitioner. In support of his submission Shri Rastogi has placed reliance on a decision of this court in Hazari v. State of Rajasthan 1978 RCC 224. 4. Taking into consideration or the facts and circumstances of the case and the age of the accused petitioner as well as the further fact that he has not been previously convicted of the said offence, I consider it a fit case in which benefit of sec. 360 Cr.P.C. may be extended to the accused petitioner. There fore, while sustaining the conviction of the accused petitioner in respect of S. 16/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act, it is directed that the accused petitioner may be released on probation if he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 2000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Kishangarh Bas to be of good behaviour and to maintain peace for a period of two years and to undertake to appear before Addl. Sessions Judge, Kishangarh Bas to undergo the sentence so awarded provided he is not required in any other case. 5. The revision petition stands disposed of as above.Revision Partly allowed. *******