JUDGMENT : N.N. Goswamy, J. 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 9th May, 1979, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Delhi whereby the application of the Petitioner u/s 151 of the CPC for restoration of 1 an application under Order 9, Rule 9 was dismissed on the ground that the same had been filed beyond a period of 30 days, which was the prescribed period of limitation under Article 122 of the Limitation Act, 1963. 2. The impugned order is liable to be set aside on the ground that there is no period of limitation prescribed for such an application and Article 122 of the Limitation Act is hot applicable. This stands decided by various decisions of High Courts. See in this connection Somar Bhuiya and Others Vs. Kapil Kumar Gautam and Others, and Komal Chand Beniparshad v. Poorna Chand Mool Chand AIR 1970 M.P. 198. In view of this, the petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside and the case is sent back to the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal with the directions that the application dated 20th March, 1979, filed by the Petitioner be decided on merits and not on the ground of limitation as has been done by the impugned order. There will be no order as to costs.