JUDGMENT : 1. Special leave granted. 2. Having heard counsel for the parties, I think that the proper order which should be passed in this case should be as follows : 3. Instead of allowing the suit to proceed, which will take a long time to dispose of, we direct the plaintiff to produce all the documents for the purpose of discovery and inspection and after the said documents are filed, the admission and denial of the documents should be done within a month from the date of the receipt of this order by the Trial Judge. Thereafter immediately the plaintiff will produce his witnesses. No adjournment for the production of witnesses will be allowed by the learned Judge and the evidence will be concluded with- in a month from the date of the production of the witnesses. There- after, the defendant without any delay shall proceed to examine his witnesses and the Court will conclude the said evidence within a month. The matter would then be argued and the High Court is requested to give its decision within a month so that the entire suit is disposed of within four mont4 from today. Meanwhile, learned counsel for defendant No. 20 gives an undertaking to this Court that although he will not make any construction on the premises, but he will start the developing activity so that he may not be liable for confiscation of the land under the Ceiling Rules. It is obvious that once the developments start, there would be no prejudice to defendant No. 20. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Judge on 16.8.1982. The learned Judge will give top priority to this case and dispose it of within four months as mentioned above. In view of the undertaking given by the learned counsel for defendant No. 20, it will not be necessary to set aside the Order of the High Court vacating the injunction passed Order dated August 9, 1982 in Civil Appeal No. 2604 of 1982. by the Court. It is also manifest that any observations made by the High Court in respect of the injunction matter were made for the very limited purpose of deciding it and would in no way prejudice the cases of either parties at the trial. It will be open to the parties to apply for further directions if and when necessary. 4. It is also manifest that any observations made by the High Court in respect of the injunction matter were made for the very limited purpose of deciding it and would in no way prejudice the cases of either parties at the trial. It will be open to the parties to apply for further directions if and when necessary. 4. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.