Research › Browse › Judgment

Delhi High Court · body

1983 DIGILAW 260 (DEL)

AVINASH CHAND SHARMA v. TARUN BALA SHARMA

1983-09-09

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI

body1983
A. B. Rohatgi, J. ( 1 ) THE parties have entered into a compromise. They have presented a written application setting-forth the terms of compromise. ( 2 ). Mr. Basaria. counsel for the wife, says that the appeal of the husband may be allowed a decree for divorce may be passed. For the prooosition that decree for divorce can be passed in these circumstances he has brought to my attention a judgment of the Punjab High Court in Daveder Singh v. Lavleenkaur, 1982 All India Hindu Law Reporter 135. ( 3 ). In view of the compromise and the pronouncements referred to in the said decision of the Punjab High Court, I allow the appeal and grant a decree of divorce on the basis of the compromise deed Ex. A-1 which shall form part of the decree. The parties will be bound by the terms of the compromise. ( 4 ). A sum of Rs. 29,000. 00 has been paid by the husband to the wife. Both of them are present in court. The husband has also handed over the ornaments to the wife in the presence of the court Other goods also will be delivered by the husband to the wife today in terms of the compromise. ( 5 ). There will, however, be no order as to costs.