JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. In the circumstance of the case the learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner is not previous convict and the quantity of opium seized is only 660 grams, so the petitioner may be given the benefit of probation. 3. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case I am inclined to accept the prayer of the learned counsel for the appellant for the grant of probation to the petitioner. 4. In the result, the revision is partly allowed, the conviction of the petitioner is maintained and instead of sentencing the petitioner, it is ordered that he be released on probation on his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 3,000/- (rupees three thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfication of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class No. 1, Hanumangarh, to appear and receive sentence whenever he is called upon to do so within a period of six months. In the meantime he shall keep peace and be of good behaviour.Revision Partly allowed. *******