JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant urged that the sentence awarded to the appellant is severe. The appellant has been sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 50/- in default to undergo further three months rigorous imprisonment under Section 324, 1.P.C. and to five years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default, to undergo further six months rigorous imprisonment under Section 325/34, I.P.C. The appellant is aged about 65 years. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case in my opinion, the ends of justice would meet if substantive sentence under both the counts is reduced to one years' rigorous imprisonment and the sentences of fine under both the counts are set aside. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is partly allowed. The convictions of the appellant under both the counts are maintained. However, the substantive sentence awarded to the appellant under both the counts is reduced to one year's rigorous imprisonment and his sentences of fine under both the counts are set aside. The substantive sentences under both the counts shall run concurrently.Appeal partly allowed. *******