Research › Browse › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

1984 DIGILAW 451 (RAJ)

Mafta v. The State of Rajasthan

1984-09-27

K.S.LODHA

body1984
JUDGMENT 1. - This is a bail application on behalf of nine accused persons who are facing tnal for offence under Sections 302 and 149 Indian Penal Code etc. 2. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor and have gone through the police papers. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners Mafta, Narsa, Raja and Surta does not press their bail application at this stage. 4. So far as the other petitioners are concerned, I am of the opinion that looking to all the circumstances of the case and the fact that no specific injuries to the deceased had been attributed to them and there is only omnibus evidence against them, they may be released on bail. 5. I, therefore, allow the bail application of Sona, Masunga, Shanti, Nawa and Kastura and direct that they shall be released on each of them furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- ( Rs. five thousand) with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 2.500/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Sirohi for their appearance before that Court on the next date of hearing and on all subsequent dates. 6. The bail application of Mafta, Narsa Raja and Surta is dismissed as not pressed at this stage.Bail application allowed. *******