JUDGMENT Parmeshwar Dayal, J. - The learned counsel for the parties stated that a civil case with respect to the property in question is pending. Reference has been made to the case of Ram Sumer Puri Mahant v. State of U. P. and others ( 1985 LCD 75 ) and to the same case ( AIR 1985 SC 472 ). In these cases, it was held that when a civil litigation is pending for the property wherein the question of possession is involved and has been adjudicated, initiation of a parallel criminal proceeding under Section 145 CrPC would not be justified. In view of the statements of the learned counsel of the parties and the said decisions, this petition is fit to be allowed and the proceedings under Section 145 CrPC are liable to be quashed. 2. The learned counsel for the opposite parties referred to a compromise, the correctness of which compromise is disputed by the learned counsel for the applicant on the ground that if at all there had been a compromise, it was obtained under duress. As such, it is not considered for the purpose of this case. 3. This petition under Section 482 CrPC, is, however, allowed and the proceedings under Section 145 CrPC in Criminal Case No. 21 of 1982, pending before the City Magistrate; Faizabad are quashed. Let a copy of this judgment be supplied to the learned counsel of the parties on payment of necessary charges today, if possible.