Judgment :- 1. The petitioner has suffered an order of regular assessment. As against that, it has preferred an appeal and pending the appeal stay was sought for. It is further stated that a bank guarantee for the entire disputed tax has been furnished. By the impugned order, the respondent has chosen to direct only payment of the tax dues in four instalments. 2. Mr. R. Lok Priya, Additional Government Pleader, represents the respondent. The prayer in the writ petition is for the issue of a writ of certiorarified Mandamus to quash the order, dated 20th May, 1985 of the respondent and further to direct him to grant absolute stay of collection of sales tax. In support of this prayer, Mr. R.L. Ramani, learned counsel for the petitioner, draws my attention to the pronouncement of Natarajan. J. in Dolton Printers Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1. When the bank guarantee is there, that will provide ample safeguard for the revenue. In the said circumstances, to call upon the petitioner to pay the very disputed tax is not only harsh but also not a judicial and a proper exercise of the power of discretion reserved for the authority like the respondent under the proviso to S. 31(5) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The present impugned order only discloses a mechanical exercise of power without resorting to the appopriate consideration on the question of stay. This obliges me to interfere in writ jurisdiction. Accordingly, I direct that the bank guarantee already furnished by the petitioner shall hold good provided it is kept alive during the pendency of the appeal in question before the respondent and the impugned order is hereby quashed. No costs. 3. In spite of the pronouncement of this Court referred to above, I find that the authorities like the respondent resort to passing such mechanical orders and this constrains parties like the petitioner to approach this Court in writ jurisdiction. It is high time that the highest in the hierarchy to the authorities looked into the matter and gave appropriate instructions to the concerned to adhere to the principles enunciated by this Court so as to avoid parties rushing to this Court for redress and relief.