JUDGMENT : ( 1. ) THIS is a reference under Section 44 (1) of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax for decision of the following questions of law, namely : (i) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the sale of the stock of motor spirit which has suffered tax under the M. P. Sales of Motor Spirit and Lubricants Taxation Act, 1957 (Act No. 4 of 1958) will be exempt from levy of tax under the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, on and after 1st August, 1972 (i. e. , the date from which the Motor Spirit Act was repealed) taking support from the provisions of Section 8 (1) of the M. P. Vitta Adhiniyam, 1972 and Section 10 of the M. P. General Clauses Act, 1957 ? (ii) Whether provisions of Section 54 of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, will be applicable for claiming exemption on sales of the stock of motor spirit on and after 1st August, 1972 ? ( 2. ) THE dealer carries on retail business in motor spirit and lubricants. It had purchased the same from wholesale dealers after payment of tax under the M. P. Sales of Motor Spirit and Lubricants Taxation Act, 1957, on the goods, which was in its stock on 1st August, 1972. The dealer claimed that on this stock available with it on 1st August, 1972, tax had already been paid and, therefore, no further tax on the same could be imposed on sales of the same effected after 1st August, 1972 by this dealer. The assessing authority rejected this contention. The first appeal of the dealer was also dismissed. In second appeal, this contention of the dealer was accepted by the Tribunal. Aggrieved by this decision of the Tribunal, the Commissioner of Sales Tax sought a reference to this Court for decision of the aforesaid questions of law and this is how these questions arise for decision by us. ( 3. ) THERE is no controversy that the view taken by the Tribunal is in consonance with the settled view of this Court. ( 3. ) THERE is no controversy that the view taken by the Tribunal is in consonance with the settled view of this Court. In (1983) 16 VKN 311 (Commissioner of Sales Tax, M. P. v. Chhogalal and Sons) it was held that the tax-paid goods purchased under the Motor Spirit Taxation Act were not liable for payment of sales tax under the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 after repeal of the Motor Spirit Taxation Act. This decision has been followed in subsequent decisions. Following that decision, this reference has to be answered in favour of the dealer. ( 4. ) CONSEQUENTLY, the reference is answered against the Commissioner of Sales Tax and in favour of the dealer by saying that the Tribunal was justified in the view it has taken in the dealers favour. No costs.