JUDGMENT Kaushal Kishore, J.- This revision petition has been filed against the judgment and order dated 30.4.1976, dismissing the revision against the order dated 11.12.1975 by the learned trial court allowing the penal lawyer to withdraw the case u/s 122-B of the UPZA & LR Act and permitted him to file suit u/s 202 of the Act. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also perused. 3. It may be observed that the application by the penal lawyer and permission granted by the learned trial court both were mis-conceived. When the Gaon Sabha or the local body fails to take action, the Collector starts proceedings for ejectment and damages against the person in unauthorised occupation on Gaon Sabha/local body land. In these summary proceedings, there is no first party in the usual sense. 4. These are no regular suits having two parties. Therefore, there was no question of any penal lawyer withdrawing any application. There was no bar to filing a suit u/s 202 of the Act in spite or proceedings u/s 122-B decided either way. On this basis also, withdrawal would be meaningless. Proceedings u/s 122-B are summary proceedings for ejectment and case u/s 202 is a regular suit which is not barred by any earlier summary proceedings u/s 122-B. Therefore, no permission was needed to file suit u/s 202 of the Act. 5. In the instant case, since the opposite party was asami recorded in varg-3, so there was no other way than to file a suit u/s 202 on behalf of the Gaon Sabha and this can freely be done by the Gaon Sabha after an LMC resolution. 6. In the circumstances, there can be no grievance to the revisionist, but in view of the correct legal position, the trial court order dated 11.12.1975 and the whole proceedings u/s 122-B of the Act are hereby quashed.