JUDGMENT Kaushal Kishore, Member - This revision petition arises out of a case under Section 122-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act in which the learned trial court passed order dated May 15, 1976 for ejectment of the revisionist from No. 68/1-3-0 and damages and the revision against this order was rejected by the learned Additional Commissioner, Meerut by judgment dated January 25, 1977. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also perused the record. 3. The argument that Kure son of Jagram was recorded in Varg-4 on 13 Biswas only, so the Appellant who is brother of Kure could be ejected from 13 Biswas only, has no substance. Kure was ejected in 1970 i.e., around 1377-F. The possession of Bhanwar Singh was reported and found from 1379-F. There is no connection between the two unauthorised occupation in different periods. For this same reason, res-judicata also will not apply. 4. There can be repeated summary ejectment's under Section 122-B of the Act from same land, of same or different persons occupying the Gaon Sabha land in different Fasli years. There is no decision of title under Section 122-B of the Act. The ejectment or otherwise is possible as and when unauthorised occupation occurs. The unauthorised occupation in one Fasli year with following legal action has no effect on unauthorised occupation in a subsequent Fasli year and related proceedings. Obviously, the principle of res-judicata cannot be applied unless the decision relates to proceedings under Section 122-B of the U.P.Z.A. and Land Reforms Act against same persons for same land and for same period of unauthorised occupation. 5. I agree with the learned D.G.C. (R) that the learned trial court duly found revisionist in unauthorised occupation in 1376F-1378F on 1-3-0 land plot No. 684 and there is no illegality or material irregularity in passing the order dated 5.15.1976. 6. Accordingly, this revision is found to be without force and is dismissed with costs.