JUDGMENT P. Dayal, J. - The facts giving rise to this petition arc that a theft was committed in the house of Babu Lal Gupta is Mohalla Chhitta Kheres, P.S. Bazar Khala, district Lucknow in the night between December 21/22, 1977 at about 1.30 a.m. The lady Smt. Chandrawati caught hold of the revisionist Sunder and another inmate of the house, namely, Janki Prasad caught hold of the revisionist Kalloo. The revisionist Sunder caused injuries on the person of Smt. Chandrawati while the revisionist Sunder assaulted Janki Prasad also by means of a Lota and pushed him back making him to fall down. On alarm a number of Mohalla people reached there. 2. The arrested revisionist were taken to the police station where F.I.R. was lodged. The two injured persons were medically examined. The case was investigated and a charge-sheet was submitted against the revisionist. 3. The prosecution examined all the necessary witnesses including four witnesses on the point of occurrence. Smt. Chandrawati could not be examined as she was dead. 4. The learned Magistrate convicted and sentenced the revisionist Sunder under Section 457 I.P.C. to two years R.I. and under Section 323 I.P.C. to two months R.I. while he convicted and sentenced the revisionist Kalloo under Section 457 I.P.C. to two years R.I. by means of an order dated March 31, 1978. There revisionist tiled a Criminal Appeal No. 73 of 1978 which was dismissed on January 25, 1979. 5. The revisionist filed the present revision which was admitted on the point of sentence. It is not disputed that the revisionist committed the theft and caused injuries, as has been the prosecution cases and they were rightly convicted by the two courts below. As about the quantum of sentence awarded to them, it would be in the fitness of things for the ends of justice that it each one of them is sentenced to one years R.I. under Section 457 I.P.C., with the result that this revision succeeds on the point of sentence. 6. The revision is accordingly allowed to the extent that each one of the revisionist is sentenced to one years R.I. under Section 457 I.P.C. instead of 2 years R.I. while the rest of the judgments and orders passed by the two lower courts are confirmed. 7. 6. The revision is accordingly allowed to the extent that each one of the revisionist is sentenced to one years R.I. under Section 457 I.P.C. instead of 2 years R.I. while the rest of the judgments and orders passed by the two lower courts are confirmed. 7. The revisionist are on bail; their bail bonds are cancelled and they should be taken into custody to same the sentences, passed against them.