(1) WE have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length. The learned counsel states that the petitioner is extremely apprehensive of the consequences which will result from compliance with the order of the High court directing admission of the two candidates and the learned counsel has strenuously contended that respondents 2 and 3 are not qualified at all for admission. It seems to us that this is a question which is more appropriate for the consideration of the High court itself as the writ petition is pending before it. We do not propose to interfere at this stage and, therefore, reject these special leave petitions. We make it clear, however, that the respondents 2 and 3, whose admission has been directed by the High court, will be admitted subject to the adjudication of their rights of admission when decided in the writ petition. Their admission at this stage will not confer any further right to continue in the institution greater than that which they enjoy under prospectus. The High court will consider the feasibility of disposing of the writ petition early, if possible, before the end of September 1986. COURT Master.