JUDGMENT 1. - Heard. The police has submitted challan against four persons. I have perused the papers of challan, the present petitioners have not been made accused in challan. They have not shown as absconded. Mr. Gupta learned counsel for the petitioners argued that there is no case against these petitioners, otherwise they would have been shown as accused. He apprehended their arrest. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor read over the statement of Sunder Lal and contained that this witness has named Bhanwar Lal and Inder Singh who were present at the spot. He therefore approach the bail application. 3. This is important aspect that the petitioners have not been made accused in the challan. They have not shown as absconders. It means that when the challan was submitted the investigating officer did not find any material against these petitioners in order to make them accused. Without reflecting on the merit of the case, I am of the Petitioner be enlarged on bail. 4. The bail application is, therefore, accepted. It is directed that the petitioners should not be arrested on furnishing a surety of Rs. 5000/- and personal bond of same amount to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer in FIR No. 19/85 Police Station Mangrole, on the following conditions:- 1. That the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a Police officer as and when required; 2. That the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer ; and 3. That the petitioners shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. Bail granted. *******