(1) SPECIAL leave granted. Heard both the sides. (2) THE appellant who was accused 2 in the trial court is the sister of accused 1. Accused 1 was carrying on his criminal activities in the house of accused 2. Merely because the appellants brother was carrying on criminal activities in her house, the appellant cannot be held guilty unless there is some material to show her complicity. In the present case there is no material to show that the appellant had connived at or abetted her brother (accused 1). Under the circumstances, the conviction cannot be sustained. She is entitled to benefit of reasonable doubt as the case against her is not established beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal, is therefore, allowed and the order of conviction and sentence as against the appellant Marry Perara Lilly is set aside. Appeal is allowed accordingly. The appellant need not surrender.