JUDGMENT P. Singh, Member - This reference has been made by the learned Additional Commissioner, Agra Division, Agra, vide his order dated August 8, 1986 for setting aside the trial court's order dated August 14, 1983. 2. It appears that Govind Singh son of Sujan Singh, resident of village Bhavpur, Tahsil Jasrana, filed a suit under Section 176 of U.P. Act I of 1951. The suit was contested by Smt. Durgjyoti Kumari and others. The plaintiff claimed that he had share in the land in suit. On March 8, 1983, Govind Singh, moved an application for amending his plaint under Order VI, Rule 17, C.P.C. The trial court allowed that application. Against that order a revision was preferred before the learned Additional Commissioner before the learned Additional Commissioner who has made the recommendation aforesaid. 3. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicants. None appears on behalf of the opposite party in spite of the date fixed by the learned Additional Commissioner. 4. I find that the learned Additional Commissioner is of the view that the plaintiff, through the amendment application, claimed himself to be the sole Bhumidhar or the plot in dispute and he did not file an order of any court, and if the amendment sought by the applicant is allowed, the nature of the suit will change to one under Section 229-B of U.P. Act I of 1951. I find that the view expressed by the learned Additional Commissioner suffers from no illegality. If the plaintiff claims that he is sole bhumidhar of the land in question, the nature of the suit will certainly change and, September 14, 1983 is set aside, and the trial court are not sustainable in the eye of law. 5. In view of the above, the revision is allowed, the order of the trial court dated September 14, 1983 is set aside, and the trial court is directed to proceed with the suit in accordance with law.