JUDGMENT B.N. Sapru, J. - This is a tenant's revision arising out of a suit for eviction. 2. The plaint allegations were that the defendant was a tenant of the ground floor and he had made certain construction on the first floor. The ejectment of the tenant was sought. 3. After the plaintiff's evidence was started, tenant raised a plea that the Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit, as the property other than the property which is in the tenancy of the defendant tenant, was included in the suit. 4. The Court has found that a reading of the plaint makes it clear that the constructions made on the first floor had been treated as a material alteration entitling the plaintiff's to an ejectment decree. The Court observed that where there are material alteration or not, would be decided after the evidence. 5. It cannot be said that the view of the Court below was apparently unjustified. The application was made to delay the proceedings. 6. The revision is accordingly dismissed summarily. 7. The learned Counsel for the applicant has prayed that the suit should be decide at the earliest. The Court below should dispose of the suit expeditiously.