Judgement [SUPREME COURT EDITORIAL NOTE : Facts of the case The respondent - M.A. Chowdhary was appointed as a Staff Artist in All India Radio, Bombay under an agreement executed by him with the Director General of All India Radio. The agreement was for three years. On the expiry of three years, the respondent was reemployed and his contract was renewed on yearly basis up to 30th November, 1964. Thereafter he was re-employed on a five years contract. On November 2, 1967 the Government of India passed an order stating that Staff Artists should be allowed to remain in service up to the age of 55 years. Accordingly, a clause was added to the agreement executed by the respondent, stipulating that the respondent shall remain in service up to December 31, 1985 on which date he was to attain the age of 55 years. Clause 4 (v) of the agreement however, provided that the respondents service will be liable to be terminated on 6 months notice on either side. In due course, the respondent was transferred to All India Radio, Varanasi. The Assistant Station Director of All India Radio, Varanasi issued a notice dated 5th October, 1970 intimating the respondent that this services would stand terminated on the expiry of 6 months from 5th October, 1970 in accordance with Cl. 4 (v) of the agreement. The respondent challenged the validity of the aforesaid termination notice by writ petition filed in the High Court of Allahabad. The learned single Judge held that having regard to the service conditions, it must be held that the respondent was holding a civil post, and as such was entitled to the protection of Arts. 311(2) and 16 of the Constitution, and that in as much as persons junior to him had been retained in service, the Appointing Authority in terminating his service had violated Art.16 of the Constitution. On these grounds, the notice of termination of the respondents service was held bad and quashed. In appeal, the Division Bench held that in view of Cls. On these grounds, the notice of termination of the respondents service was held bad and quashed. In appeal, the Division Bench held that in view of Cls. (1) to (4) of the Agreement it is apparent that the Government in consideration of a monthly salary controls the nature and manner of work assigned to the staff artists, that the Government had complete control over the respondents work and manner and method of doing the work, which was supervised by the higher authorities, that the relationship between the respondent and the appellant was clearly of master and servant, and the respondent was, therefore, holding a civil post within the meaning of Art. 311 (1) of the Constitution. The authority to terminate the respondents service on 6 months notice emanated from the contract but nonetheless it has the effect of violating Art. 311 (1) of the Constitution. It must comply with Art. 311 (2), otherwise the termination would be a removal from service within the meaning of Art.311(2), otherwise the termination would be a removal from service within the meaning of Art.311 (2) and in the violation of its provisions. The Division Bench held that the notice of termination was void and rightly quashed by the learned single Judge and dismissed the appeal of the Union of India.] ORDER :- Shri A. K. Ganguli, learned counsel for the Union of India submits that Art. 311 of the Constitution is applicable to the Staff Artists of the All India Radio. We are of the view that the statement made on behalf of the Government represents the true legal position because the Staff Artists are holding civil posts under the Government. In view of the above statement, this appeal filed against the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad in Special Appeal No. 258 of 1974 which has also taken the view that Art. 311 is applicable to those Staff Artists has to be dismissed. This appeal, is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Appeal dismissed.