JUDGMENT A.N. Dikshita, J. - Aggrieved against the order of the Prescribed Authority and the VIth Additional District Judge, Shahjahanpur releasing the accommodation in favour of the respondent landlord on the ground of bona fide requirement the instant petition has been filed. 2. Findings of facts recorded by the Court below cannot be interfered in these proceedings. It is not a fit case for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition being misconceived is accordingly dismissed in limine. However the learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri Ramendra Asthana submits that some time be allowed to the petitioner to vacate the accommodation in view of the impending marriage of the daughter of the petitioner on 30-6-1987. The request manifestly is bona fide. The petitioner is granted time to vacate the accommodation which is in his possession. The petitioner has filed a supplementary affidavit stating therein that he would vacate the accommodation without any protest any where by 15-8-1987. In case the petitioner fails to vacate the accommodation by 15-8-1987 the Prescribed Authority shall resort to Coercive process to put into possession the landlord respondent within two days i.e. by 18-8-1987.