JUDGMENT M.M. Gopal, Member - This is a revision against the judgment of the trial court dated July 12, 1976 by which an order for ejectment and payment of damages was passed. The learned Additional Commissioner by his order dated June 23, 1986 has recommended for quashing the aforesaid order. 2. Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the file. 3. Proceedings under Section 122-B of the U.P. Act No. I of 1951 was started against the revisionist and it is stated that the revisionist was in possession since 1359 F. Notice was issued with the recommendation that the damages of Rs. 10350/- should be imposed. 4. From the order dated July 12, 1976 it is clear that the order was passed ex-parte and the revisionist was not present. But from the facts, it is clear that the possession is from 1359F and the damages proposed to be imposed was Rs. 10350/- but actually the damages was imposed Rs. 11250/-. 5. No discussion has been done about the possession which is since 1359 Fasli i.e. before the enforcement of the Zamindari Abolition. 6. Hence on the face of it the order is not speaking order and the mistake is apparent on the face of it. I accept the reasoning given by the learned Additional Commissioner. 7. The revision is therefore allowed and the order dated July 12, 1976 is set aside. The case is remanded to the trial court to decide it after hearing the parties and giving them opportunity to produce evidence.