(1) LT appears thatthe spcial leave ptition was disposed of by this Court by an order dated 13/10/1986 withthe following observa- tions: "THE special leave petition is dismissed. We find thatthe rever- sion ofthe petitioner was oniy for a period of one year w.e.f. 10/01/1983 andthe petitioner was entitled to be posted again as Assistant Registrar on 10/01/1984 and we hve no doubt thatthe needfl will be done." (2) FROMTHE facts inthe ptition it appears thatthe observation of this court that tothe effect "th petitioner was entitied to be posted again as Assistant Registrar on 10/01/1984 and we hve no doubt thatthe needfl will be done" was not warranted inthe facts of this case. Th aforesaid observations had been made ex parte atthe admission stage. Now boththe sides hve appeared and we hvethe facts. We, therefore, deletethe aforesaid observation or direction.the petitioner in this case had madethe reprsentation tothe High court andthe High Court had considered thatthe petitioner was not entitled to be posted as Assistant Registrar. In that view ofthe matter no further action need be taken. (3) CIVIL miscellaneous ptitions are disposed of accordingly.