JUDGMENT 1. - The only ground urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the accused-petitioner is employed in Army and the offence of which he has been convicted is under Section 353 and 341 Indian Penal Code and as such they are offence which could have been dealt with under the provisions of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (for short, the Act). It is further contended by him that in view of the mandate of legislature contained in Section 361 Cr. P.C., if the court considers that the case of the accused should not be dealt with under the afore-said provisions, then it is the duty of the court to record in its judgment special reasons therefor, which have not been recorded. 2. It appears that the occurrence took place on May 1, 1981 at about 2.30 p.m. and it is alleged that the accused-petitioner teased Subhash Devi a girl of 16 years while she was returning on a cycle from her school. The accused petitioner grappled with her and outraged her modesty and when other persons came, he ran away. In my opinion, it is a fit case, moreso when the accused petitioner is employed in Indian Army, that he should be dealt with under beneficial provisions of the Act. 3. Consequently, I partly allow this revision and while maintaining the conviction of the petitioner it is directed that instead of being sentenced him at once, the petitioner shall be released on his entering into a bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court undertaking to appear and receive sentence as and when called upon during the period of one year and in the meantime to keep the peace and be of good behaviour. The fine if deposited shall be refunded to him. The petitioner is directed to furnish the requisite bonds within a period of three months failing which the learned trial court shall take steps and see that the petitioner serves out the sentence awarded to him.Revision allowed. *******